From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1917
94 S.E. 850 (N.C. 1917)

Opinion

(Filed 28 November, 1917.)

Master and Servant — Employer and Employee — Disobedience of Orders — Contributory Negligence.

Where an employee unnecessarily disobeys the order of his employer, and for that sole reason has met his death in coming into contact with electric wires of another company, his contributory negligence will bar a recovery in an action for damages for his wrongful death.

CIVIL action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff's intestate.

G. A. Smith and T. A. Adams for plaintiff.

Cansler Cansler, John M. Robinson, Osborne, Cocke Robinson for defendants.


Motion to nonsuit was sustained. Plaintiff appealed.


The deceased was employed by the Water Commissioners in patching gutters on the pumping station. While so engaged he came in contact with the electric current of the Southern Power Company's wires that supply the motive power of the station and was killed. These wires pass over the roof and enter the main building of the station and are supported by stanchions some 4 feet and 9 inches in height and carry a very heavy current, some 40,000 volts.

(1) There is no evidence of a failure to perform any duty that either defendant owed plaintiff's intestate.

(2) The defendants offered no evidence. Plaintiff's evidence makes out a clear case of contributory negligence. The intestate was instructed to patch only the gutters, warned not to get near the wires, and told to move his ladder around to the west gutter after finishing the middle gutter, and thus avoid the wires. If he had heeded instructions he would not have been injured.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Murphy v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1917
94 S.E. 850 (N.C. 1917)
Case details for

Murphy v. City of Charlotte

Case Details

Full title:MRS.E. MURPHY, ADMX., ETC., v. THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE, BOARD OF WATER…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1917

Citations

94 S.E. 850 (N.C. 1917)
174 N.C. 771

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Duke Power Co.

Had he obeyed the instructions by remaining on the ground instead of getting on top of the power house, he…