From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Blumenreich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 10, 1908
123 App. Div. 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

January 10, 1908.

David J. Gladstone, for the appellant.

No appearance for the respondent.


No notice of defendant's application for a discharge in bankruptcy was given to plaintiff; he never received any notice that the application had been made until served with motion papers in this proceeding. It appears that his name and address have appeared in the City Directory of the city of Brooklyn (where the judgment was docketed) for several years; that the name and address of the attorney of record who procured the judgment have also appeared in the same City Directory, and also in the Telephone Directory of the city of Brooklyn, and yet the place of residence of the judgment creditor was given as Hoboken, N.J., a place where he never resided.

The Bankruptcy Act (30 U.S. Stat. at Large, 548, § 7) provides that the bankrupt shall schedule his property, showing the amount and kind of property, the location thereof, and a list of his creditors, showing their residences, if known; if unknown, that fact to be stated. This the bankrupt did not do. Inquiry of the attorney of record would have revealed the residence of the creditor, or he might have ascertained the judgment creditor's place of residence by consulting the Brooklyn City Directory, where the judgment was docketed, but instead of doing this gave a fictitious address. Plaintiff's debt was not properly scheduled, and the order directing that the judgment be canceled and discharged of record must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

WOODWARD, JENKS, GAYNOR and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Blumenreich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 10, 1908
123 App. Div. 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Murphy v. Blumenreich

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. MURPHY, Appellant, v . GUSTAV BLUMENREICH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 10, 1908

Citations

123 App. Div. 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
108 N.Y.S. 175

Citing Cases

Continental Purchasing Co., Inc. v. Norelli

Under these circumstances, it has been held that the debt is not released. See in re Quackenbush, 122 App.…

Wyser v. Estrin

been duly scheduled in time for proof and allowance, with the name of the creditor, if known to the…