From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MURPHY v. ASHLEY ARMS APARTMENTS

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Oct 27, 2005
Civil Action No.: 2:05-2469-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 2:05-2469-CWH.

October 27, 2005


ORDER


On August 25, 2005, the plaintiff, a resident of South Carolina, filed a complaint pro se against Ashley Arms Apartments; Ms. Carol Farr, manager of Ashley Arms Apartments; the US Department of Housing and Urban Development; Housing Authority; Wholesale Appliance Center; and Londell Williams, salesman at Wholesale Appliance Center.

On September 9, 2005, Magistrate Judge George C. Kosko filed a report and recommended that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Attached to the report and recommendation was a "Notice of Right to File Objections." Pursuant to that Notice, the plaintiff herein was provided ten days during which to file written objections to the report and recommendation and informed of the consequences resulting from a failure to do so. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The plaintiff has not filed any objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

Accordingly, The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Kosko's report and recommendation and dismisses this action without prejudice and without service of process for lack of jurisdiction.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MURPHY v. ASHLEY ARMS APARTMENTS

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Oct 27, 2005
Civil Action No.: 2:05-2469-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2005)
Case details for

MURPHY v. ASHLEY ARMS APARTMENTS

Case Details

Full title:Rosanne Edwards Murphy, Plaintiff, v. Ashley Arms Apartments; Ms. Carol…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No.: 2:05-2469-CWH (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2005)

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Barns

" Devlin v. Houghton, 202 Mass. 75, 78. On the evidence such an action could have been maintained against…

Peck v. Goff

In many cases of pledge where the pledge itself is a chose in action and incapable of actual manual delivery,…