From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphey v. Maynard

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 3, 2010
368 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-6873.

Submitted: February 25, 2010.

Decided: March 3, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-01711-DKC).

William A. Murphey, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, Kramon Graham, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William A. Murphey appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to appoint counsel, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Murphey v. Maynard, No. 8:08-cv-01711-DKC (D. Md. filed Jan. 23, 2009 entered Jan. 26, 2009; Mar. 16, 2009; filed Apr. 15, 2009 entered Apr. 16, 2009). We deny Murphey's motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Murphey v. Maynard

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 3, 2010
368 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Murphey v. Maynard

Case Details

Full title:William A. MURPHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary MAYNARD, Secy-DPSCS; John…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 2010

Citations

368 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2010)