From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murph v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 25, 2008
Case No. SC07-1666 (Fla. Jan. 25, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. SC07-1666.

January 25, 2008.


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murph v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 25, 2008
Case No. SC07-1666 (Fla. Jan. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Murph v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST C. MURPH, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

Case No. SC07-1666 (Fla. Jan. 25, 2008)