From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murph v. Patton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 9, 2014
Case No. CIV 13-513-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Sep. 9, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CIV 13-513-RAW-KEW

09-09-2014

RICKY REANORDO MURPH, JR., Petitioner, v. ROBERT PATTON, DOC Director, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

On this date the court dismissed petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus as barred by the statute of limitations. After careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). See also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

ACCORDINGLY, petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of September 2014.

/s/_________

RONALD A. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Murph v. Patton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 9, 2014
Case No. CIV 13-513-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Sep. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Murph v. Patton

Case Details

Full title:RICKY REANORDO MURPH, JR., Petitioner, v. ROBERT PATTON, DOC Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Sep 9, 2014

Citations

Case No. CIV 13-513-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Sep. 9, 2014)