From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murnick v. City of Asbury Park

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Dec 12, 1983
193 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

Submitted October 25, 1983 —

Decided December 12, 1983.

Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O'BRIEN.

On appeal from the Tax Court, reported at 5 N.J. Tax 406 (1983).

Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz Kinney, P.A., for appellants ( Carl G. Weisenfeld and Paul H. Brownstein, of counsel and on the brief).

Rosenblum Rosenblum, for respondent ( Edward G. Rosenblum, of counsel and on the brief).


The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Andrew's reported opinion, 5 N.J. Tax 406 (1983).


Summaries of

Murnick v. City of Asbury Park

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Dec 12, 1983
193 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Murnick v. City of Asbury Park

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Dec 12, 1983

Citations

193 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 1983)
471 A.2d 1203

Citing Cases

Clearview Gardens Associates v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills

The burden of proof would be upon each of the parties to demonstrate that the assessment should be…