From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murillo v. W.L. Montgomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 31, 2024
CV 20-0031-KK(AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2024)

Opinion

CV 20-0031-KK(AGR)

03-31-2024

MAXIMILANO MURILLO, Petitioner, v. W. L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. KENLY KIYA KATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Murillo v. W.L. Montgomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 31, 2024
CV 20-0031-KK(AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Murillo v. W.L. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:MAXIMILANO MURILLO, Petitioner, v. W. L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 31, 2024

Citations

CV 20-0031-KK(AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2024)