From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muratori v. 1231 Pugsley Avenue Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County
Nov 16, 1956
15 Misc. 2d 276 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)

Opinion

November 16, 1956

I. Ben Greenman for plaintiffs.

William J. Tropp for defendant.


The plaintiff moves for an order to direct the defendant to give the plaintiff a copy of the medical report rendered by a court-appointed physician who conducted a physical examination of the plaintiff pursuant to an order of the court. The court is aware of the earlier decisions in this department which deny the plaintiff's right to a copy of such a report. The court is, however, persuaded that this rule no longer obtains. It is hostile to the present day tendency to reduce to a minimum, if not entirely to eliminate, controversy on the medical aspects of personal injury actions. This tendency finds signal illustration in the special rule for medical examinations in personal injury actions adopted by the Appellate Division in this department, under which examinations are made by a member of a medical panel. An examination conducted under the aegis of the court is not to be regarded as the sole property of one of the litigants. It must be available to both. ( Del Ra v. Vaughan, 2 A.D.2d 156.) The motion is accordingly granted. It is gratifying to note that my colleague, Mr. Justice EDER, has just reached the same conclusion. ( Kuyamjian v. Murrah, 5 Misc.2d 204.)

Settle order.


Summaries of

Muratori v. 1231 Pugsley Avenue Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County
Nov 16, 1956
15 Misc. 2d 276 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
Case details for

Muratori v. 1231 Pugsley Avenue Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MURATORI et al., Plaintiffs, v. 1231 PUGSLEY AVENUE REALTY CORP.…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County

Date published: Nov 16, 1956

Citations

15 Misc. 2d 276 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
157 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

Totoritus v. Stefan

Such requirement was included in the order. Mr. Justice HOFSTADTER reached the same result in the case of…

Nadav v. Kozlowski

The Appellate Division of this department, affirming by a divided court, in both opinions ( 6 A.D.2d 123),…