From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muntz v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Aug 19, 2008
07-CV-6020L (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-6020L.

August 19, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


Pending before the Court is a motion by plaintiff, a prevailing party in this action for Social Security benefits, for an order awarding attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). (Dkt. #12). Pursuant to a contingent fee agreement with plaintiff providing for attorneys fees in the amount of 25% of any award recovered by plaintiff, plaintiff's counsel, Donald R. Bleier, seeks fees in the amount of $25,720.75, which constitutes the balance of 25% of the past due benefits awarded to plaintiff.

By Stipulation and Order dated and entered August 1, 2008 (Dkt. #15), this Court previously awarded plaintiff attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 USC § 2412(d) in the amount of $7,168.22, plus $367.52 for costs, for a total of $7,535.74.

The Commissioner does not oppose plaintiff's motion.

I find that the amount of the requested fee is reasonable, in light of the character of the representation, Bleier's expertise in Social Security law, the results achieved, and the absence of any delay in the proceedings by Bleier. See Silliman v. Barnhart, 421 F. Supp.2d 625 (W.D.N.Y. 2006); Joslyn v. Barnhart, 389 F.Supp.2d 454 (W.D.N.Y. 2005). In so finding, the Court has considered the deference that is owed to agreements between an attorney and client, the interest in assuring future representation for disability claimants, and the lack of any factor indicating that the requested award would result in a windfall. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 802, 122 S.Ct. 1817 (2002).

Plaintiff was awarded approximately $102,883.00 for nearly five years of past-due benefits. Pursuant to the contingency fee agreement between plaintiff and Bleier, Bleier is therefore entitled to twenty-five percent of the total award for past-due benefits. The Commissioner has withheld a comparable amount from plaintiff's past-due benefits, and plaintiff has filed an affidavit consenting to the fee. (Dkt. #12, Att. 1).

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. #12) in the amount of $25,720.75 is granted. The award is to be made payable to Donald R. Bleier, Esq., attorney for plaintiff.

This decision is entered on the assumption that the previously-awarded EAJA fees have been paid directly to the plaintiff and were not retained by plaintiff's counsel (Dkt. #15). Were it not so, the Court would order that the amount of the EAJA fees be refunded to plaintiff at this juncture.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Muntz v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Aug 19, 2008
07-CV-6020L (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Muntz v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MUNTZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

07-CV-6020L (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2008)