From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munster v. Benoliel

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1901
33 Misc. 586 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

January, 1901.

Coudert Bros. (John P. Murray, of counsel), for appellant.

Wahle Stone (Charles G.F. Wahle, of counsel), for respondent.


The refusal of the trial justice to accept the additional requests submitted by counsel for the defendant, and especially the refusal of the court to have them noted by the stenographer when so requested by counsel, constitute a fatal error in the conduct of the trial requiring a reversal of the judgment. Chapman v. McCormick, 86 N.Y. 479; O'Neil v. Dry Dock, E.B. B.R.R. Co., 129 id. 125; Pfeffele v. Second Ave. R.R. Co., 34 Hun, 497. As the requests in question were improperly excluded from the record by the trial justice, and are, therefore, not before us, we cannot assume that they were but repetitions of the instructions given to the jury.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Munster v. Benoliel

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jan 1, 1901
33 Misc. 586 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Munster v. Benoliel

Case Details

Full title:LEWIS CASS MUNSTER, Respondent, v . DAVID J. BENOLIEL, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1901

Citations

33 Misc. 586 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
67 N.Y.S. 1044