From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munson v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 11, 2018
Case No. 6:18-cv-00650-MC (D. Or. Dec. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 6:18-cv-00650-MC

12-11-2018

STEVE MUNSON, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER :

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank moves to strike Plaintiff Steve Munson's Second Amended Complaint for failure to comply with Rule 15. Def.'s Mot. to Strike, ECF No. 16. Plaintiff has not filed a response, and the time to do so has passed.

This Court previously dismissed Plaintiff's claim for violation of OAR 137-110 with prejudice. The remaining fraud claims were dismissed without prejudice. Op. and Order 6-7, ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to amend his complaint and re-state his fraud claims with specificity. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on August 10, 2018, ECF No. 13, and a Second Amended Complaint on August 13, 2018, ECF No. 14.

Because Plaintiff did not obtain leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, this court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Strike. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11th day of December, 2018.

s/Michael J. McShane

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Munson v. Wells Fargo Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 11, 2018
Case No. 6:18-cv-00650-MC (D. Or. Dec. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Munson v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:STEVE MUNSON, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Dec 11, 2018

Citations

Case No. 6:18-cv-00650-MC (D. Or. Dec. 11, 2018)