From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 9, 2014
No. 05-13-00914-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-13-00914-CR No. 05-13-00915-CR

10-09-2014

ENRIQUE MUNOZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F-1333134-K, F-1333106-K

ORDER

The record reflects that the trial court did not pronounce the sentences in the presence of the defendant. Therefore, the trial court is ORDERED to conduct a sentencing hearing for the sole purpose of pronouncing the sentences in the presence of the defendant, and is further ORDERED to transmit to this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of this order, a supplemental reporter's record reflecting the oral pronouncement of such sentences. We further ORDER that new judgments with the new sentencing dates be prepared and transmitted to this court in a supplemental clerk's record.

These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The clerk of the court is directed to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Judge Dominique Collins, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court Number 4, Dallas County, Texas, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

PRESIDING JUSTICE


Summaries of

Munoz v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 9, 2014
No. 05-13-00914-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Munoz v. State

Case Details

Full title:ENRIQUE MUNOZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Oct 9, 2014

Citations

No. 05-13-00914-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 9, 2014)