From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munoz v. Eliezer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 29, 2020
16 CIVIL 6049 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. May. 29, 2020)

Opinion

16 CIVIL 6049 (NSR)

05-29-2020

CARLOS MUNOZ, Plaintiff, v. C.O. ROBINSON ELIEZER, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order of Dismissal dated May 29, 2020, on March 20, 2018 all the claims asserted against defendants Dr. Bentivegna and Nurse McCarthy were dismissed; Now, Therefore, pursuant to the terms of the March 2, 2020 Order and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), all remaining claims against defendants Robinson Eliezer, Keith Chase, Jeffrey Benaim, Shaun Medina, and James Goehl are dismissed; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

May 29, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Munoz v. Eliezer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 29, 2020
16 CIVIL 6049 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. May. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Munoz v. Eliezer

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MUNOZ, Plaintiff, v. C.O. ROBINSON ELIEZER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 29, 2020

Citations

16 CIVIL 6049 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. May. 29, 2020)