Opinion
No. 92-1693.
November 10, 1993.
E.D.Mich., 792 F.Supp. 1472.
DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS
REVERSED.
No. 92-1693.
November 10, 1993.
E.D.Mich., 792 F.Supp. 1472.
REVERSED.
listing substantially similar factors
Summary of this case from Dunn v. Postapplying the "but for" standard to a federal sector ADEA claim
Summary of this case from McGrady v. Esperapplying the "but for" standard to a federal sector ADEA claim
Summary of this case from Seaton v. Perduedescribing affidavits of two Imams debating the significance to Muslims of Islamic prayer oil and concluding that "the use of prayer oils is entitled to constitutional protection under the free exercise clause"
Summary of this case from Charles v. VerhagenFull title:Munir v. Scott
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Nov 10, 1993
The Sixth Circuit has not authoritatively decided this question. But see Parnell v. Stone, 12 F.3d 213…
Johnson v. LopezSee Mullenix, 136 S.Ct. at 308 (quotation marks and quoted references omitted) (explaining that "[t]he…