From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mundine v. Gustafson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 5, 2016
No. 15-20525 (5th Cir. Oct. 5, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-20525

10-05-2016

JEREMY MUNDINE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LIEUTENANT GUSTAFSON, Defendant-Appellee DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Debtor-Appellee ALL THREE WARDENS OF ELLIS UNIT; OFFICER SMITH; MS. REED; DOCTOR BETTY WILLIAMS; SENIOR WARDEN M. ROESLER; ASSISTANT WARDEN GORSUCH; WARDEN LANDIS, Defendants-Appellees


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CV-2169 Before JONES, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Jeremy Mundine, Texas prisoner # 1131861, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Mundine does not dispute that he has three strikes but argues that he should not be subject to the § 1915(g) bar because he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. In support of his contention, he asserts that he was required to perform manual labor in violation of medical restrictions, and, as a result, he suffered severe pain, and his pre-existing back injury worsened. Mundine acknowledges that he received medical treatment, additional medical restrictions, and a new work assignment following his most recent injuries, but he insists that he remains in imminent danger.

Mundine's allegations do not establish that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Baños v. O'Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Mundine v. Gustafson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 5, 2016
No. 15-20525 (5th Cir. Oct. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Mundine v. Gustafson

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY MUNDINE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LIEUTENANT GUSTAFSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 5, 2016

Citations

No. 15-20525 (5th Cir. Oct. 5, 2016)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Murray

Because Moore received a new brace in June 2021, his allegation about his May complaint to Chan is of limited…

Hearn v. MTC

The undersigned finds that Hearn does not meet § 1915(g)'s “imminent danger” exception to the “three strikes”…