From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mumphrey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Dec 6, 1989
780 S.W.2d 259 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 1046-89.

October 25, 1989. Rehearing Denied December 6, 1989.

Appeal from the 359th Judicial District Court, Montgomery County; James H. Keeshan, Judge.

George E. Renneberg, Conroe, for appellant.

Peter C. Speers, III, Dist. Atty., and Thomas D. Glenn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Conroe, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION


Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at 35 years in the Texas Department of Corrections after finding appellant had a previous felony conviction. On appeal the Beaumont Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Mumphrey v. State, 774 S.W.2d 75 (Tex.App. — Beaumont 1989).

Appellant raises one ground for review. We agree with the Court of Appeals majority that it does not require reversal. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning or language employed by the Court of Appeals majority. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant's petition for discretionary review.


Summaries of

Mumphrey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Dec 6, 1989
780 S.W.2d 259 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)
Case details for

Mumphrey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Arthur M. MUMPHREY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Dec 6, 1989

Citations

780 S.W.2d 259 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)