Opinion
NO. 5:12-CV-00754-BO
04-08-2013
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's motion for discovery (DE-31), referred to the undersigned. Defendants oppose the motion (DE-32) on the grounds that the Court has not yet issued an order for a discovery plan, the parties have not yet conferred as required by Rule 26(f), no scheduling order is in place, and there is no reason to expedite discovery.
Federal Rule 26(d)(1) of Civil Procedure states, "A party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(f), except . . . when authorized by these rules, by stipulation, or by court order." As discovery would be premature at this time, the motion for discovery (DE-31) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Raleigh, North Carolina this 8th day of April, 2013.
_________________
WILLIAM A. WEBB
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE