From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mumin v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Mar 5, 2019
4:04CV3058 (D. Neb. Mar. 5, 2019)

Opinion

4:04CV3058

03-05-2019

DUKHAN IQRAA JIHAD MUMIN, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Notice of Appeal (filing no. 44) filed by Petitioner Dukhan Mumin on February 22, 2019. Petitioner appeals from the court's Memorandum and Order dated February 5, 2019, summarily denying his "Request for Relief from Judgment as an Independent Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 60(d)(1)" which the court construed as a motion. (Filing No. 43.) Also before the court is a memorandum from the Clerk of the Court requesting a ruling as to Petitioner's authorization to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Filing No. 45.)

Petitioner has failed to include the $505.00 appellate filing and docket fees. Petitioner has not previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court in connection with his § 2254 petition. Thus, Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3), which continues in forma pauperis status on appeal without further authorization, does not apply. "An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The court hereby certifies that the appeal filed by Petitioner in this case is frivolous and not taken in good faith for the reason that Petitioner's "Request for Relief from Judgment as an Independent Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 60(d)(1)" challenges "a judgment originating from the Lancaster County District Court in case number CR11-954," (filing no. 42 at CM/ECF p. 1. ¶ 4), while the present habeas matter challenged Petitioner's conviction in the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, on December 13, 1998 (filing no. 1). Thus, the present case is wholly unrelated to the subject matter of Petitioner's denied motion. Since the appeal is not taken in good faith, Petitioner cannot file an appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

Dated this 5th day of March, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mumin v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Mar 5, 2019
4:04CV3058 (D. Neb. Mar. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Mumin v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:DUKHAN IQRAA JIHAD MUMIN, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Mar 5, 2019

Citations

4:04CV3058 (D. Neb. Mar. 5, 2019)