From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulvena v. Dep't of Transp.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 28, 2013
495 Mich. 879 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 147356. COA No. 311126.

2013-10-28

Rose M. MULVENA, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission (MCAC) for the MCAC to review and assess all of the evidence in the record beyond that of Dr. Knitter's testimony and, in light of that evidence, to reconsider whether the magistrate's decision is supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence on the whole record. Although the MCAC's decision that Dr. Knitter's testimony is not competent evidence to prove causation is supported by the record, the magistrate relied on more than just Dr. Knitter's testimony to rule in favor of the plaintiff, and the MCAC's opinion fails to discuss this remaining evidence. As a result, the MCAC failed to assess the whole record as required by MCL 418.861a(3).

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Mulvena v. Dep't of Transp.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 28, 2013
495 Mich. 879 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

Mulvena v. Dep't of Transp.

Case Details

Full title:Rose M. MULVENA, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 28, 2013

Citations

495 Mich. 879 (Mich. 2013)
495 Mich. 879