stating that there must be "more than `mere evidence' that the defendants were aware of [plaintiff's] expressive conduct in order to establish a genuine material dispute as to whether retaliation was a substantial or motivating factor for their conduct"
Summary of this case from Maniates v. Lake County OregonNo. 04-1060.
April 18, 2005.
Certiorari Denied.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 381 F. 3d 917.
stating that there must be "more than `mere evidence' that the defendants were aware of [plaintiff's] expressive conduct in order to establish a genuine material dispute as to whether retaliation was a substantial or motivating factor for their conduct"
Summary of this case from Maniates v. Lake County OregonFull title:MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL. v. ALPHA ENERGY SAVERS, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 18, 2005
First, for her First Amendment retaliation claim, Maniates did not present evidence during her case in chief…