From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullin v. Woodmere-Cedarhurst Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

March, 1928.


Concededly, at the closing defendant tendered a bargain and sale and not a full covenant and warranty deed. Judgment modified by directing that, if plaintiff elect to comply with the terms of the contract as reformed and as provided by the judgment herein, the title be closed at a time to be fixed, within thirty days after the entry of the order herein, and that adjustments be made as of that date. As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Mullin v. Woodmere-Cedarhurst Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Mullin v. Woodmere-Cedarhurst Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. MULLIN, Appellant, v. WOODMERE-CEDARHURST CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)