From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulligan v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 23, 1949
89 N.E.2d 256 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1949

Decided November 23, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BENVENGA, J.

Paul Windels and Herbert J. Jacobi for appellant.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Helen R. Cassidy, Seymour B. Quel, Pauline K. Berger and Victor F. Condello of counsel), for respondent. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Wendell P. Brown and John C. Crary, Jr., of counsel), amicus curiae, in support of respondent's position.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Mulligan v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 23, 1949
89 N.E.2d 256 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Mulligan v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. MULLIGAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 23, 1949

Citations

89 N.E.2d 256 (N.Y. 1949)
89 N.E.2d 256

Citing Cases

IN MATTER OF CASTRO v. KELLY

Finally, respondents argue that mandamus does not lie, in that petitioner does not have a clear legal right…

MATTER OF STRAUSS v. Reid

Indeed, he may even pass the examination, be placed on a special eligible list, and never be reached for…