From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Total Protective Services, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Sep 18, 2007
Case No. 6:06-cv-1733-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 18, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 6:06-cv-1733-Orl-31KRS.

September 18, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 25) filed June 28, 2007.

On August 27, 2008, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 26) recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. Counts III and IV are DISMISSED.

3. The Renewed Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

4. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff Harry Muller, Jr., against Total Protective Services, Inc., Joseph Tolerico and Robert Fuson for violation of the minimum wage and overtime provision together with liquidated damages, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $6,908.00 ($3,214.00 in damages, $3,188.00 in attorney fees and $506.00 in costs) and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Muller v. Total Protective Services, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Sep 18, 2007
Case No. 6:06-cv-1733-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Muller v. Total Protective Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY MULLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. TOTAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., JOSEPH…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

Case No. 6:06-cv-1733-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 18, 2007)

Citing Cases

Rismay v. Alterations by Lucy & Crisp & Clean Dry Cleaning & More, LLC

Accordingly, Plaintiff has abandoned these claims and the undersigned will not consider them in connection…

E-Z-Dock, Inc. v. KonaDocks LLC

Accordingly, Plaintiff will be deemed to have abandoned this claim, and the undersigned will not consider it…