From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muller v. Schram

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 921 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Decided October 17th, 1927.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Church, whose opinion is reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 143.

Messrs. Bilder Bilder, for the respondent.

Messrs. Weinberger Weinberger, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Muller v. Schram

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 921 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Muller v. Schram

Case Details

Full title:PAUL MULLER, receiver, c., respondent, v. BERNARD SCHRAM et al., appellants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1927

Citations

138 A. 921 (N.J. 1927)
138 A. 921