From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mullen v. St. Cowboy Taxi, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2014
118 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-4

Dana MULLEN, plaintiff-respondent, v. STREET COWBOY TAXI, INC., et al., defendants-respondents, Nicole Renee July, appellant.

Andrea G. Sawyers, Melville, N.Y. (Jennifer M. Belk of counsel), for appellant. Suris & Associates, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Ray Suris, Susan R. Nudelman, and Christopher Doelger of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.


Andrea G. Sawyers, Melville, N.Y. (Jennifer M. Belk of counsel), for appellant. Suris & Associates, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Ray Suris, Susan R. Nudelman, and Christopher Doelger of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.
Gerber & Gerber, PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Thomas Torto and Jason Levine of counsel), for defendants-respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Nicole Renee July appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), dated January 24, 2013, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiff-respondent and the defendants-respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the appellant's submissions in support of her motion for summary judgment revealed the existence of triable issues of fact as to how the subject multi-vehicle accident occurred, thus precluding the granting of summary judgment ( see Veltri v. Solomon, 107 A.D.3d 699, 966 N.Y.S.2d 490;Hudson v. Cole, 264 A.D.2d 439, 694 N.Y.S.2d 692;Sanford v. Stillitano, 241 A.D.2d 489, 660 N.Y.S.2d 67;Omrami v. Socrates, 227 A.D.2d 459, 642 N.Y.S.2d 932). Since the appellant failed to meet her prima facie burden, her motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642). MASTRO, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mullen v. St. Cowboy Taxi, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2014
118 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Mullen v. St. Cowboy Taxi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Dana MULLEN, plaintiff-respondent, v. STREET COWBOY TAXI, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 4, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3990
986 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

Swinton v. Kamiyama

Moreover, "[t]here can be more than one proximate cause of an accident" (Cox v. Nunez, 23 A.D.3d 427, 427,…

Roskosky v. Muncan

Counsel claims that in a multi-vehicle accident where there is a question as to the sequence of collisions,…