From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MULL v. MOCK

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1929
148 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1929)

Opinion

(Filed 29 May, 1929.)

APPEAL by defendants from Harwood, Special Judge, at the March-April Special Term, 1929, of HAYWOOD. No error.

John M. Queen and Alley Alley for plaintiff.

Morgan, Ward Stamey for defendants.


The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. There was evidence tending to show that on 30 June, 1928, the plaintiff, a girl 13 years of age, was returning to her home on highway No. 10, and that she was struck by a truck belonging to the defendants and operated by one of their employees. The defense was that the plaintiff's injury was caused solely by the negligence of a man named Morgan who was driving his automobile on the highway. The controversy was reduced practically to issues of fact, which were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff. We have examined the exceptions of the appellants and have been unable to find any substantial ground for a new trial.

No error.


Summaries of

MULL v. MOCK

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1929
148 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1929)
Case details for

MULL v. MOCK

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA MULL, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, LORETTA MULL, v. J. M. MOCK ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1929

Citations

148 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1929)
197 N.C. 785