From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mulkey v. Pintar

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 2, 2016
No. 68834 (Nev. App. Mar. 2, 2016)

Opinion

No. 68834

03-02-2016

MICHAEL MULKEY, Appellant, v. GLOGOVAC & PINTAR, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing a torts action. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge.

Appellant filed a complaint and amended complaint in the district court alleging that respondent obtained his medical records in violation of the law. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint which the district court granted on the grounds that appellant failed to file an opposition, see DCR 13(3) (providing that failure to file an opposition to a motion "may be construed as an admission that the motion is meritorious and a consent to granting the same"), that appellant failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and that his claims were barred by claim and/or issue preclusion. This appeal followed.

In his appeal statement, appellant argues that the district court erred in dismissing his amended complaint because respondent violated the law by obtaining appellant's medical records, but does not put forth any argument regarding the district court's alternate bases for dismissal—that appellant failed to file an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss and that his claims were barred on preclusion grounds. As a result, we conclude that he has waived these arguments. See Powell v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 127 Nev. 156, 161 n.3, 252 P.3d 668, 672 n.3 (2011) (holding that issues not raised on appeal are deemed waived). And, accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal of appellant's amended complaint on those grounds.

It is so ORDERED.

Appellant submitted a document on January 21, 2016, entitled "Appellant Response to the Supreme Courts [sic] Order" and a "Motion to Add Exhibits to Appeal" on January 29, 2016, and we direct the clerk to file both documents. The first document does not request any relief, and, therefore, we decline to take any action on it. And, based on our decision here, we deny as moot appellant's motion to add exhibits to this appeal. --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge

Michael Douglas Mulkey

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Mulkey v. Pintar

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 2, 2016
No. 68834 (Nev. App. Mar. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Mulkey v. Pintar

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MULKEY, Appellant, v. GLOGOVAC & PINTAR, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

No. 68834 (Nev. App. Mar. 2, 2016)