From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. U.S. Marshal Service

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 9, 2009
Civ. No. 07-27 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2009)

Summary

determining whether PLRA-type administrative procedures were available to a federal pretrial detainee held at a county prison Center

Summary of this case from United States v. Loera

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-27 Erie.

February 9, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on October 15, 2008, recommended that Defendant Vincent Kinnane Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file any objections. Service was made on all parties. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2009, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Vincent Kinnane Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) is DENIED.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on October 15, 2008 (Doc. 55) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. U.S. Marshal Service

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 9, 2009
Civ. No. 07-27 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2009)

determining whether PLRA-type administrative procedures were available to a federal pretrial detainee held at a county prison Center

Summary of this case from United States v. Loera

determining whether PLRA-type administrative procedures were available to a federal pretrial detainee held at a county prison facility

Summary of this case from United States v. Folse
Case details for

Muhammad v. U.S. Marshal Service

Case Details

Full title:BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, MARSHALL BILL DOE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 9, 2009

Citations

Civ. No. 07-27 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Loera

The majority of cases, however, have applied the PRLA's exhaustion requirement to these inmates. See Muhammad…

United States v. Folse

The majority of cases, however, have applied the PRLA's exhaustion requirement to these inmates. See Muhammad…