From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Ross

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 23, 2023
2:21-cv-00776-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00776-CKD P

03-23-2023

KIFA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. SEAN ROSS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition within the time provided will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Ross

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 23, 2023
2:21-cv-00776-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:KIFA MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. SEAN ROSS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 23, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00776-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2023)