From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Reiland

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Apr 11, 2012
No. 655-658 WAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. 655-658 WAL 2011

04-11-2012

RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, Petitioner v. JAMES REILAND, JAMES ODENHEIMER, CHARLENE CHRISTMAS, INDIA SMITH, ALL IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, ALLEGHENY COUNTY (PA) DEPARTMENT OF ADULT AND JUVENILE PROBATION AND PAROLE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY (PA) AND CLAYTON SUDDUTH, Respondents


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Orders of the Superior Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Reiland

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Apr 11, 2012
No. 655-658 WAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Reiland

Case Details

Full title:RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, Petitioner v. JAMES REILAND, JAMES ODENHEIMER, CHARLENE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

No. 655-658 WAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)