From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Geo Care Justcare Department of Mental Health

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 1, 2012
472 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6007

05-01-2012

JAMES MUHAMMAD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. GEO CARE JUSTCARE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent - Appellee.

James Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:11-cv-02396-CMC) Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Muhammad appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Muhammad has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Geo Care Justcare Department of Mental Health

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 1, 2012
472 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Geo Care Justcare Department of Mental Health

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MUHAMMAD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. GEO CARE JUSTCARE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Wood v. United States

ECF No. 1-1 at p. 3. Based on Petitioner's filings, it appears the Greenville County Probate Court committed…