From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0426 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0426 MCE CKD P

04-17-2013

MAURICE MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER GARCIA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed March 8, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

____________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0426 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER GARCIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0426 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)