From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhammad v. Eischen

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Apr 4, 2024
24-cv-98 (ECT/DLM) (D. Minn. Apr. 4, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-98 (ECT/DLM)

04-04-2024

Aquil Muhammad, Petitioner, v. B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ERIC C. TOSTRUD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Magistrate Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on March 11, 2024. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED; and

2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute; and

3. Petitioner Aquil Muhammad's application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 3] is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Muhammad v. Eischen

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Apr 4, 2024
24-cv-98 (ECT/DLM) (D. Minn. Apr. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Muhammad v. Eischen

Case Details

Full title:Aquil Muhammad, Petitioner, v. B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 4, 2024

Citations

24-cv-98 (ECT/DLM) (D. Minn. Apr. 4, 2024)