From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mucci v. Decision One Mortg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 27, 2012
Civil Action No.: 12-1840 (JLL) (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 12-1840 (JLL)

08-27-2012

ALFRED MUCCI and MARIA MUCCI, Plaintiffs, v. DECISION ONE MORTGAGE et al. Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court by way of a motion to remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Essex County. (CM/ECF No. 16). On August 9, 2012, Magistrate Judge Michael Hammer issued a Report and Recommendation that this Court deny plaintiff's motion to remand. (CM/ECF No.36). No objections have been filed thereto and the time to do so has expired. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 27 day of August, 2012,

ORDERED that this Court hereby ADOPTS Judge Hammer's August 9, 2012 Report and Recommendation as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant's motion to remand is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

_________________

JoseL. Linares

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mucci v. Decision One Mortg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 27, 2012
Civil Action No.: 12-1840 (JLL) (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Mucci v. Decision One Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED MUCCI and MARIA MUCCI, Plaintiffs, v. DECISION ONE MORTGAGE et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 12-1840 (JLL) (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Scott's argument on this issue is pure speculation, and thus does not raise a proper basis for a remand at…

Pepitone v. Target Corp.

U.S.C. § 1441(b)(1); see Mucci v. Decision One Mortg., No. 12-1840, 2012 WL 3757035, at *3 (D.N.J. Aug. 9,…