From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MSIG Mingtai Ins. Co. v. Danmar Lines Ltd.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 4, 2021
21 Civ. 7994 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 7994 (AT)

10-04-2021

MSIG MINGTAI INSURANCE CO., LTD., FUBON INSURANCE CO., LTD., TAIWAN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., LTD. and CATHAY CENTURY INSURANCE CO., LTD. a/s/o Wistron Corporation and/or Wistrou Infocomm Technology America Coip, Plaintiffs, v. DANMAR LINES LTD. a/k/a DANMAR LINES AG, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of eveiy action and proceeding," Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discoveiy through remote means at eveiy available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MSIG Mingtai Ins. Co. v. Danmar Lines Ltd.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 4, 2021
21 Civ. 7994 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2021)
Case details for

MSIG Mingtai Ins. Co. v. Danmar Lines Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:MSIG MINGTAI INSURANCE CO., LTD., FUBON INSURANCE CO., LTD., TAIWAN FIRE …

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 4, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 7994 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2021)