From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 1, 2000
777 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-4040.

Opinion filed November 1, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Judge.

Affirmed.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Brad Permar, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


M.R. appeals the trial court's adjudication of delinquency for violating Tampa's juvenile curfew ordinance. See Tampa, Fla., Code § 14-26(c) (1996). He argues that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We affirm under the authority of this court's recent decisions in J.P. v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1513 (Fla. 2d DCA June 23, 2000), and State v. T.M., 761 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

We again certify the following questions of great public importance:

WHAT LEVEL OF SCRUTINY MUST A COURT APPLY WHEN REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE? WHETHER THE TAMPA JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE IS CONSTITUTIONAL?

Parker, A.C.J., and Fulmer, J., Concur.


Summaries of

M.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 1, 2000
777 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

M.R. v. State

Case Details

Full title:M.R., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 1, 2000

Citations

777 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

M.R. v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review M.R. v. State, 777 So.2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), in which the Second District…

M.R. v. State

This court previously rejected his argument and affirmed the trial court's determination that the ordinance…