From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.R. v. Brookline School District

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 16, 2006
Civil No. 05-cv-292-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-cv-292-SM.

November 16, 2006


ORDER


Re: Document No. 24, Motion For Additional Evidence

Ruling: Denied as to Dr. Afshar. Plaintiffs had him in attendance at the hearing and did not call him that day nor did they ask for another day. Denied as to Dr. Yardley. Plaintiffs objected to that evidence at the hearing. Denied as to Lambert. Plaintiffs could have introduced it at the reopened hearing. Denied as to Drs. Blom, Willis, and Goodall — no justification for it has been shown.


Summaries of

M.R. v. Brookline School District

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 16, 2006
Civil No. 05-cv-292-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 16, 2006)
Case details for

M.R. v. Brookline School District

Case Details

Full title:M.R. and C.B. v. Brookline School District

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Nov 16, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-cv-292-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 16, 2006)