From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moyer v. Spieth-Anderson, U.S.A., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 26, 1996
675 A.2d 1123 (N.J. 1996)

Summary

In Moyer v. Anderson, 203 F. 881, to the contrary, the court relied upon decisions of this court which were neither controlling or in point, such as Matter of Spencer, 228 U.S. 709; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U.S. 420; Johnson v. Hay, 227 U.S. 245, none of which contravenes the contention of appellee; in fact, the doctrine of the Anderson Case was expressly repudiated in Stevens v. McClaughry, 207 F. 18.

Summary of this case from Morgan v. Devine

Opinion

March 26, 1996


Petitions for Certification

Denied.


Summaries of

Moyer v. Spieth-Anderson, U.S.A., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 26, 1996
675 A.2d 1123 (N.J. 1996)

In Moyer v. Anderson, 203 F. 881, to the contrary, the court relied upon decisions of this court which were neither controlling or in point, such as Matter of Spencer, 228 U.S. 709; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U.S. 420; Johnson v. Hay, 227 U.S. 245, none of which contravenes the contention of appellee; in fact, the doctrine of the Anderson Case was expressly repudiated in Stevens v. McClaughry, 207 F. 18.

Summary of this case from Morgan v. Devine
Case details for

Moyer v. Spieth-Anderson, U.S.A., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MOYER v. SPIETH-ANDERSON, U.S.A., INC

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 26, 1996

Citations

675 A.2d 1123 (N.J. 1996)
144 N.J. 174

Citing Cases

Morgan v. Devine

Halligan v. Wayne, 179 F. 112, is responsible for erroneous decisions and this court has repeatedly applied a…

Remaley v. Swope

The question of whether or not the claim that the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy has been…