Summary
In Moyer v. New York Central Hudson River Railroad Company (98 N.Y. 645), the question held to be competent was "are there any adequate causes in your opinion for this," referring to the injury complained of. The court said, "the witness, an expert, might very well be asked, in the presence of a given effect, of what causes it either was or might be the resultant.
Summary of this case from Van Wycklen v. City of BrooklynOpinion
Argued February 9, 1885
Decided March 3, 1885
S.W. Jackson for appellant.
D.S. Morrell for respondent.
FINCH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.