From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MOYE v. SCHULTZ

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 19, 2006
04 Civ. 2971 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2006)

Opinion

04 Civ. 2971 (JSR).

July 19, 2006


ORDER


On May 30, 2006, the Honorable Debra Freeman, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending (1) that Moye's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254 be denied on the ground that it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations; (2) that his due process claims be dismissed as non-cognizable or moot; and, accordingly, (3) that his motion for bail be denied. Neither petitioner nor respondent has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation, and, for that reason alone, each has waived any right to further appellate review.See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons therein, dismisses Moye's petition in its entirety and denies his accompanying motion for bail. Additionally, because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from the Court's order would not be taken in good faith. Clerk to enter judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MOYE v. SCHULTZ

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 19, 2006
04 Civ. 2971 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2006)
Case details for

MOYE v. SCHULTZ

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY MOYE, Petitioner, v. SUSAN I. SCHULTZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2006

Citations

04 Civ. 2971 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2006)