From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mount Vernon Mills v. Murphy Textile Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1989
148 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Summary

holding seven month delay unreasonable as a matter of law under § 2-607

Summary of this case from ATRONIC INT'L GMBH v. SAI SEMISPECIALISTS OF AMERICA, INC.

Opinion

March 28, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leonard N. Cohen, J.).


UCC 2-607 (1) requires a buyer to pay at the contract rate for any goods accepted and subdivision (3) of that section provides that upon buyer's failure to notify the seller of the alleged breach within a reasonable time, he is "barred from any remedy". Likewise, a "[r]evocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers * * * the ground for it" (UCC 2-608).

Thus, where the goods in question, as here, were delivered to defendant's designated consignee in October 1987 and it was not until May 1988 that defendant, in response to plaintiff's suit for payment first complained that the goods were delivered late, such defense must be deemed untimely raised and insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact barring the grant of summary judgment to plaintiff. (See, Import Traders v. Frederick Mfg. Corp., 117 Misc.2d 305, 306-307.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Asch, Kassal, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Mount Vernon Mills v. Murphy Textile Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 28, 1989
148 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

holding seven month delay unreasonable as a matter of law under § 2-607

Summary of this case from ATRONIC INT'L GMBH v. SAI SEMISPECIALISTS OF AMERICA, INC.

finding claim for damages arising from the late delivery of goods barred by excessive delay in providing notice from the time at which the goods were delivered in full

Summary of this case from ATRONIC INT'L GMBH v. SAI SEMISPECIALISTS OF AMERICA, INC.
Case details for

Mount Vernon Mills v. Murphy Textile Mills

Case Details

Full title:MOUNT VERNON MILLS, INC., Appellant, v. MURPHY TEXTILE MILLS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 334

Citing Cases

Niagara Transformer Corp. v. Baldwin Techs., Inc.

Sara Corp. v. Sainty Int'l Am. Inc., No. 05-cv-2944, 2008 WL 2944862, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2008) (New York…

Medea Inc. v. Honeywell Safety Prods.

Pursuant to UCC § 2-608, a buyer "may revoke his acceptance of a lot or commercial unit whose non-conformity…