From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mott v. Mott

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 3, 1930
232 N.W. 184 (Mich. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 35,067.

Submitted June 6, 1930.

Decided October 3, 1930.

Appeal from Berrien; White (Charles E.), J. Submitted June 6, 1930. (Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 35,067.) Decided October 3, 1930.

Bill by Fred W. Mott against Pearl W. Mott for divorce. Defendant filed a cross-bill for divorce. From decree for plaintiff and awarding child to him, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Gore Harvey, for plaintiff.

Shields, Silsbee, Ballard Jennings, for defendant.


To plaintiff's bill for divorce defendant filed answer and cross-bill for divorce. Plaintiff prevailed and was awarded custody of the child, a boy four years old. Defendant has appealed.

Essentially both bill and cross-bill charge cruelty. Defendant's important allegations, in support of which she had testimony, are that plaintiff sought unnatural sexual relations. The indelicacy of this subject forbids discussion of it. People v. Carey, 217 Mich. 601. The charge, as held by the trial judge, is not sustained and the testimony given in support of it is not believed. The cross-bill was rightly dismissed and decree was properly granted to plaintiff on the proved material allegations of his bill.

The chief question is the custody of the child. Prima facie the mother is entitled to the custody of the young child. 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 11484; Weiss v. Weiss, 174 Mich. 431. But this rule does not interfere "with the right of a court of competent jurisdiction, upon investigation and upon consideration of the best interests of a minor child, to commit said child to the custody of either the father, the mother, or of some other suitable person," quoting from In re Knott, 162 Mich. 10.

The finding that the plaintiff is a suitable person to have the custody of the child is well sustained by the record, and the further finding that defendant is not a fit or suitable person is likewise sustained. Relative to her unfitness may be noted the grossly indecent matter conceived and alleged against plaintiff, her intemperate use of intoxicating liquor, her consorting with improper persons, and conduct showing small interest in her home and her child.

Affirmed.

WIEST, C.J., and BUTZEL, McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Mott v. Mott

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 3, 1930
232 N.W. 184 (Mich. 1930)
Case details for

Mott v. Mott

Case Details

Full title:MOTT v. MOTT

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 3, 1930

Citations

232 N.W. 184 (Mich. 1930)
232 N.W. 184

Citing Cases

Smith v. Ritter

" In Mott v. Mott, 251 Mich. 576, we said: "The chief question is the custody of the…

Hornbeck v. Hornbeck

While ordinarily a mother would be entitled to the custody of minor children under the age of 12 years, this…