Summary
observing that "charging a defendant in an indictment as if he were a principal will sustain proof that he acted as an aider and abettor of the principal"
Summary of this case from Platt v. SheetsOpinion
1992.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Motion Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1992
63 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 1992)
Summaries of
Motion Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1992
63 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 1992)
observing that "charging a defendant in an indictment as if he were a principal will sustain proof that he acted as an aider and abettor of the principal"
Summary of this case from Platt v. Sheetsobserving that "charging a defendant in an indictment as if he were a principal will sustain proof that he acted as an aider and abettor of the principal"
Summary of this case from State v. Plattobserving that "charging a defendant in an indictment as if he were a principal will sustain proof that he acted as an aider and abettor of the principal"
Summary of this case from State v. HortonCase details for
Motion Docket
Case Details
Full title:MOTION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
63 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 1992)
Citing Cases
State v. Platt
A charge of complicity may be stated in terms of this section, or in terms of the principal offense. See,…
State v. PhillipsThough appellant was charged with and the jury returned a guilty verdict for felonious assault, the judge…