From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 22, 2000
25 S.W.3d 628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77019

Date: August 22, 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Jimmie M. Edwards, Judge.

Nancy Lynne Vincent, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Catherine Chatman, for respondent.

Before: Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER


Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mosley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 22, 2000
25 S.W.3d 628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Mosley v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE MOSLEY, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 22, 2000

Citations

25 S.W.3d 628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)