From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosley v. Nooth

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 12, 2010
CV. 09-297-MO (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2010)

Opinion

CV. 09-297-MO.

January 12, 2010


ORDER


On December 3, 2009, plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (#21). A party submitting a written motion to the court is required to serve the motion "upon each of the parties" to the lawsuit. Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(a). Petitioner's Motion does not include a certificate of service. Based upon the lack of a certificate of service, coupled with the lack of any response from respondent, the court is left to conclude that petitioner failed to serve a copy of his Motion on counsel for respondent. As a result, plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#21) is DENIED without prejudice.

All pretrial, discovery, and dispositive motions remain due by March 1, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mosley v. Nooth

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 12, 2010
CV. 09-297-MO (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Mosley v. Nooth

Case Details

Full title:WRICKEY L. MOSLEY, Plaintiff, v. MARK NOOTH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 12, 2010

Citations

CV. 09-297-MO (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2010)