Moses v. Chapman

1 Citing case

  1. Howell v. Amerson

    156 S.E.2d 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    This defendant, having warned of the only defect about which he knew, fulfilled his duty. 3. That the husband may have suffered a fatal shock from his use of the drill a short while after borrowing it from defendant was not a foreseeable event in the light of defendant's action in changing the connection plug and making a personal test of the drill before lending it. Daneker v. Megrue, 114 Ga. App. 312 ( 151 S.E.2d 157); Moses v. Chapman, 113 Ga. App. 845 (1) ( 149 S.E.2d 850). 4. It was error to deny defendant's motion for summary judgment.