From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mosely v. TDCJ Michael Unit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 8, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17cv230 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 8, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17cv230

06-08-2018

JIMMY MOSELY, JR., #1954147 v. TDCJ MICHAEL UNIT, et al.


MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Jimmy Mosley, Jr., an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The lawsuit was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) as well as the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

After a review of the pleadings, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report, (Dkt. #7), recommending that Plaintiff's civil rights lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to obey an order of the Court. A copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff at his address; return receipt requested. The docket shows that Plaintiff received a copy of the Report on December 5, 2017. (Dkt. #8). However, to date, no objections to the Report have been filed.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law."). Accordingly it is

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #7), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Further, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights lawsuit under is DISMISSED without prejudice. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

So Ordered and Signed

Jun 8, 2018

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mosely v. TDCJ Michael Unit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 8, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17cv230 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Mosely v. TDCJ Michael Unit

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY MOSELY, JR., #1954147 v. TDCJ MICHAEL UNIT, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jun 8, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17cv230 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 8, 2018)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Tex. Dep't of Motor Vehicles

was ever filed nor was there any request for an extension to comply with the court's order); see also Sagers…