From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morton v. Perkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 12, 1964
163 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 63-756.

May 12, 1964.

Appeal from the Civil Court of Record for Dade County, David J. Heffernan, J.

Koppen Watkins, Miami, for appellant.

Marchant, Perkens, Cook Schenerlein, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered upon a directed verdict in an action wherein he sought to recover a brokerage commission against the estate of the deceased, allegedly due because of a listing granted by the agent of the deceased.

It is apparent from the record that the broker had a listing but, even resolving all inferences in his favor as we are required to do on a directed verdict, the record fails to establish the fact of agency. Therefore, the trial judge is affirmed in directing a verdict for the estate of the deceased principal. However, this action would not be determinative of any possible cause of action that the broker might have against the one who gave him the listing.

Martin v. Thompson, Fla.App. 1960, 124 So.2d 744; Brookshire v. Florida Bendix Co., Fla. App. 1963, 153 So.2d 55.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Morton v. Perkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 12, 1964
163 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Morton v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:OREN E. MORTON, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH A. PERKINS, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 12, 1964

Citations

163 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Morton v. Harrington

PER CURIAM. Following the opinion and mandate of this court in Morton v. Perkins, Fla. App. 1964, 163 So.2d…