From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morse v. Apartment Inv. & Mgmt. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 15, 2011
CASE NO. CV11 05492 AHM (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV11 05492 AHM (Ex)

09-15-2011

CASEY CONNOR MORSE, Plaintiff, v. APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, d/b/a and/or a/k/a AIMCO PROPERTIES, LP and JOHN DOE HUMAN PERSONS and/or ENTITY-PERSONS, Defendants.

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP Victoria L. Ersoff Matthew O. Kovacs Attorneys for AIMCO Parrish and Shaw, An Association of Attorneys Larry E. Parrish Attorney for Plaintiff Law Offices of Charles S. LiMandri Charles S. LiMandri Attorney for Plaintiff


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Complaint Filed: January 19, 2011

[Assigned for All Purposes to Judge A. Howard Matz, Courtroom 14]

Discovery Cutoff: None Set

Motion Cutoff: None Set

Trial Date: None Set

This cause came before the Court on a Joint Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice, filed jointly, by Defendant, Apartment Investment And Management Company, d/b/a and/or a/k/a AIMCO Properties, LP and John Doe Human Persons and/or Entity-Persons (hereinafter collectively "AIMCO") and Plaintiff, Casey Connor Morse (hereinafter "Plaintiff"). This Court, being duly advised, finds, based on and because of the arguments between AIMCO and Plaintiff judicially admitted in the Joint Motion that the Joint Motion should be GRANTED. Therefore, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-styled case should be and the same hereby is dismissed without prejudice;

FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that AIMCO, in California Superior Court, shall not assert any defense, to claims made in the instant civil action, based on the accrual of any applicable statute of limitation, contending that the civil action was filed on a date later than January 19, 2011 or based on res judicata or any similar claim preclusive doctrine or theory so long as Plaintiff refiles the case in California Superior Court no more than thirty (30) days after this order is filed, or by October 12, 2011, whichever is the last to occur

_______________________

UNITED STAGES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED IN FORM AND SUBSTANCE:

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP

Victoria L. Ersoff

Matthew O. Kovacs

Attorneys for AIMCO

Parrish and Shaw, An Association of Attorneys

Larry E. Parrish

Attorney for Plaintiff

Law Offices of Charles S. LiMandri

Charles S. LiMandri

Attorney for Plaintiff


Summaries of

Morse v. Apartment Inv. & Mgmt. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 15, 2011
CASE NO. CV11 05492 AHM (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Morse v. Apartment Inv. & Mgmt. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CASEY CONNOR MORSE, Plaintiff, v. APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV11 05492 AHM (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)